|
Valproic Acid - a
potential Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor (HDACi) for HRPC - more evidence
needed
Definitions
Gene expression: The process by which a
gene's coded information is converted into the structures present and
operating in the cell. Expressed genes include those that are transcribed
into mRNA and then translated into protein and those that are transcribed
into RNA but not translated into protein (e.g., transfer and ribosomal RNAs).
Histones: A type of protein found in chromosomes. Histones bind to DNA, help
give chromosomes their shape, and help control the activity of genes.
Acetylation: Process of introducing an
acetyl group (CH3CO) into an organic compound with deacetylation being the
removal of he acetyl group.
HDAC: Histone deacetylase (HDAc) is an enzyme that changes the way histone
binds to DNA. HDAc inhibitors are being studied as a treatment for cancer.
Differentiation: The modification of
cancerous cells back toward "normal cells."
cytostatic: tending to retard cellular
activity and multiplication; as opposed to cytotoxic which kills cancer
cells.
MTD: maximum tolerated dose, generally
determined during a phase I clinical trial.
PK: pharmacokinetics. The terminal half
life of VPA is 8-11 hours. However, the ER version is designed to
release valproic acid over more than 18 hours.
VPA: Valproic Acid. Depakote ER
is a brand name. ER stands for extended release for once/day dosing.
Also called divalproex sodium. There is also a delayed-release(DR)
formulation.
Introduction
Currently, there are at least three drugs
in the HDACi class that are available to patients (with a prescription) -- valproic acid
(Depakote), vorinostat (Zolinza, originally it was called SAHA) and phenylbutyrate. Valproic acid (Depakote) is a
used for certain types of seizures and convulsions and for preventing
migraine headaches (with the ER form). Vorinostat has recently been approved for
treating cutaneous T-Cell lymphoma and is being studied in HRPC patients.
Phenylbutyrate is used to help treat a deficiency of enzymes that aid in the
removal of ammonia from the body. For prostate cancer, these are all
used "off label."
This article will only be
covering valproic acid and its extended release form of Depakote ER.
Vorinostat has also had a phase II clinical trial for HRPC and that will covered
briefly.
HDACI (Histone deacetylase
inhibitors): What are they?
A thorough explanation of HDACIs is beyond the scope of this article and the
reader is referred to references 1-5 as well as many others listed in PUBMED.
Even narrowing a PUBMED search to HDACIs and prostate cancer yields 41
publications. In brief, histone acetylation results in increased gene
expression and this process is regulated by histone acetylation transferases
and histone deacetylases. A number of cancers disrupt these
mechanisms. Inhibiting histone deacetylases, therefore results in
greater gene expression which is associated with differentiation and growth
arrest. HDACIs thus are thought to target multiple pathways.
A review paper(6) by Morris MJ and Scher
HI, while it was focused on research at MSKCC, covers some basic points
related to targeted therapies. Targeting individual pathways is
difficult when the pathways have variable expression and with screening
methods that are not up to the task of finding appropriate patients for the
drug. An example they used was HER2 where the expression of HER2
substantially varied both by clinical state and site of disease.
Furthermore, better
screening and tumor sampling strategies were needed, but not available - so
they discontinued further development of Herceptin for prostate cancer.
Another example is where targeting a single protein involved in a single
pathway might be insufficient to achieve a clinically significant response -
in this case an antisense oligonucleotide that targeted BCL-2 which ended up
producing no significant anti-tumor effects.
Targeting multiple pathways, then, may
be a better approach by maximizing the likelhood of achieving clinical
responses and by minimizing the need to identify patients with
uncharacteristic expression of a single protein. Histone deactylase
inhibitors target multiple pathways.
Valproic Acid (VPA)
(2-propylpentanoic acid).
Brand name: Depakote ER.
Single Agent Studies
Valproic Acid structurally belongs to
the short-chain fatty acid class of HDAC Inhibitors. VPA inhibits cell
growth, regulates differentiation, and may have effects on tumor invasion
and angiogenesis (reference (7) lists 3 papers relevant to this.)
Most of the data on VPA comes from
pre-clinical models. Xia Qinghua, et al (7) recently reviewed their
results for in vitro and in vivo studies. Their results suggest that
short term (acute) treatment with VPA leads to growth inhibition and cell
death in prostate cancer cells -- but, unfortunately, once the treatment is
stopped the antiproliferation effect ceases. However, when
administered continuously (chronically - 10-14 days), cell proliferation decreases
profoundly in vitro (petri dish cells) and there is a significant reduction
in tumor volume at clinically relevant doses in vitro (mouse models.)
Their thought is that VPA would be a good agent for men with rising PSAs
when tumor burden is low, perhaps leading to a lengthening of the PSA
doubling time. They also found that the androgen receptor is
down-regulated with chronic VPA treatment.
S. Sharma, et al (8) looked at VPA both
in pre-clinical studies and in a small group of patients with androgen
independent prostate cancer (AIPC). Six cell lines, including prostate
cancers were treated to escalating concentrations of VPA over 24-144 hours.
They found that VPA inhibited all solid tumor cells lines in a
dose-dependent and time-dependent manner. Longer times and higher dose
levels were best (at least 72-96 hours with 2-4mM.) Patients with AIPC
were given oral VPA every week or as tolerated. The doses used were
10, 15, 20, and 25mg/kg). Assuming a 70kg patient, this would correspond to
700mg to 1750mg (it isn't clear from the abstract whether or not this is
just once per week or every day.)
There were only 5 patients in this
study. Transient decreases in PSA were seen in all 5 when PSA was normalized
to the testosterone level taken at the same time as the PSA level. Three of
4 patients had increases in their normalized PSA when they stopped VPA and
one patient, re-starting VPA after stopping it had a normalized PSA decline.
Side effects were all grade 1 and were confusion (1 patient), fatigue (3),
dizziness (2) and nausea and vomiting (1).
Hopefully, a full paper will be
published on this study since only an abstract exists at this time. So
far, this is the only study that seems to be available using single agent
VPA in AIPC patients.
Atmaca, et al (9) recently
published their results in a phase I trial with VPA and refractory advanced
cancer -- 1 patient with prostate cancer was included. The doses used and
toxicities are of interest here.
There were 26 patients progressing with solid tumors. The starting dose was VPA 30mg/kg/day
(Doses: 30, 60, 75, 90, 120mg/kg). Intravenous VPA was given over 1 hour for 5
consecutive days of a 21 day cycle. The daily dose was divided in half. The MTD was 60mg/kg/day. PK study:
the 30 and 60mg/kg doses resulted in baseline VPA median concentrations in
the range usually achieved during anti-epileptic therapy (50-120mg/l). The
median maximum serum concentrations for the 30 and 60mg/kg dose levels of
VPA did not exceed 200mg/l. No DLT was observed for these dose levels.
For the 90 and 120mg/kg doses median baseline concentrations often exceeded
120mg/l and median maximum concentrations, in this case, were above 200mg/l
with some up to 500mg/l. They suggested that the high maximum
concentrations may contribute to the occurrence of DLTs.
Atmaca, et al found that neurocognitive
impairment was the DLT(grade 3 or 4) for in 8(31%) of 26 patients and 7 of
the 8 the DLT was represented by confusion or disorientation. There were no
grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities. Five patients had fatigue, 2 were
grade 3 (DLT). 13 patients has grade 1 or 2 nausea and/or vomiting.
Somnolence occurred in 21 patients with 19 of the 21 being grade 1 or 2. The
other two had DLT at the 120mg/kg level.
One last HDACi is appropriate here --
Vorinostat (SAHA). A phase II trial is being run (ASCO 2007 Annual meeting,
Abstract No. 5132, M. Hussain, et al) as a treatment following failed 1st
line chemotherapy. Patients took oral vorinostat 400mg/day in a 21-day
cycle. They found considerable toxicities requiring dose reduction. At
the time of the abstract submittal there were 9 response evaluable patients
and 3 of them achieved stable disease (23 of 29 patients had been accrued.)
Summary of Dose, method of delivery
for single agent VPA
| Study |
Oral or IV |
Phase |
No. of
Patients |
Dose(s) |
PSA
Response? |
|
S. Sharma,
et al (8) |
Oral |
AIPC patients
Pre-phase I,
|
5 |
10, 15, 20,
25mg/kg |
Transient
decreases when normalized to testosterone |
|
Atmaca,
et al (9) |
IV |
Phase I,
solid tumors, 1 had prostate cancer. |
26 |
30mg/kg with
MTD 60mg/kg. No DLTs observed at these dose levels. The highest
dose used was 120mg/kg. |
The 1 PCa patient was not
mentioned as a responder. The two responders(NSCLC, CRC) had stable
disease for 3 and 5 mos. respectively. |
|
reference: level
for seizures - therapeutic concentrations |
Oral |
N/A |
N/A |
15-60 mg/kg.
50-130 μg/mL(.3-.8 mmol/L per (13)
16mg/kg/day divalproex (delayed release VPA): peak VPA plasma concentrations of 127 μg/ml (about .9
mM).
|
N/A. |
N/A - not applicable.
Combination Studies with VPA
Cell and/or xenograph level Studies
with VPA and Chemotherapy
Unfortunately, there do not seem to be
any published studies of VPA and chemotherapy at the in vitro/in vivo level.
There are (10, 11) two cell level studies of depsipeptide (FK228) in
combination with gemcitabine (GEM) and/or docetaxel (DOC) in vitro and in
vivo against hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). These are
included here as an indication as to what might also be possible with VPA,
but whether or not a similar effect occurs with VPA awaits actual data.
The paper by M. Kanzaki, et al (10) used
low concentrations of FK228 - no effects on the cell cycle arrest and
apoptosis induction were observed at this low concentration level --
however, pretreatment of cells with low dose enhanced the cytotoxicity
of both chemotherapeutic agents and the GEM enhancement was greater than
that with DOC.
The other paper, by Z. Zhang, et al
(11), looked at FK228 plus docetaxel and found that "FK228/docetaxel
surpassed other FK228-based combinations by
achieving more synergism of cytotoxicity. FK228 enhanced the therapeutic
effect of docetaxel against AIPCa by exhibiting markedly enhanced and
prolonged inhibitory effects in vitro and better tumor regression in vivo by
inducing apoptosis."
FK228 is now called Romidepsin and the
results of a phase II trial with it in HRPC men (C. Parker et al, ASCO 2007,
abstract # 15507, IV FK228 13mg/m2 3 out of 4 weeks) during which they
achieved a PSA RR of 7% and a "disease control rate" of 14%.
They suggested that combining FK228 with something else should be studied.
Clinical Trials with Combination
Therapy of VPA and Chemotherapy
Münster PN, et al (12, 13) have published the results
of their phase I study of VPA and Epirubicin, a topoisomerase II inhibitor.
Epirubicin is an anthracycline chemotherapy marketed by Pfizer under the
trade name Ellence in the US. This phase I trial had 48 patients
enrolled, 44 provided toxicity data and 41 were available for response.
Only 2 patients had prostate cancer (5%).
Previous studies(14, 15) had determined
that VPA needed to be given before topoisomerase II inhibitor dosing. Given
concurrently with or after the topoisomerase II inhibitor resulted in no
beneficial effect. The present trial initially gave an IV
"loading" dose of VPA followed by 5 oral doses of Depakote administered
every 12 hours beginning one hour after the loading dose. Epirubicin
was administered on day 3, 4 hours after the last VPA dose. The VPA IV
loading dose was changed to an oral loading dose when rapid infusions
produced unwanted toxicities. The oral loading dose ranged from 75mg/kg up
to 160mg/kg (MTD). The every 12 hour oral dosing ranged from 37.5mg/kg to
80mg/kg. There were 41 patients that could be evaluated for response --
9(22%) had partial responses and 16(39%) had stable disease for 12 weeks or
more.
One of the prostate cancer patients had
liver involvement and he had a partial response (100mg/kg oral loading plus
50mg/kg q12h x 5, 100mg/m2 Epirubicin); the results for the other
prostate cancer patient are not mentioned. There were no dose limiting
toxicities, but all 3 patients in this cohort had grade 3/4 neutropenia, 1
had anemia and 1 had hypocalcaemia.
Valproic Acid Combined With Retinoid
Acid (RA (ATRA-IV))
D. M. Atieh, et al (16) did a phase I
trial of VPA plus RA with 9 patients, 5 of whom could be evaluated for
toxicity of both drugs of which one was a prostate cancer patient.
They had not yet reached the MTD of VPA. Oral VPA was dosed starting at
10mg/kg every 8 hours until trough VPA serum concentrations of 50-80; 80-100
and 100-120 μg/ml were reached. One patient had a transient decline in PSA.
Summary of Dose, method of delivery
for VPA plus other agents such as chemotherapy or retinoid acid.
| Study |
Oral or IV |
Phase |
No.
of
Patients |
Dose(s) |
PSA Response? |
|
Münster P,
et al, (13) |
Oral, delayed release form
of VPA. |
Phase I,
Solid Tumor
patients |
48; 44 OK for toxicity
eval. 41 OK for response assessment. |
Phase II dose: 140
mg/kg/day on days 1-3 before epirubicin 100mg/m2, q3 weeks. |
A partial response was
seen in 1 prostate cancer patient. |
|
D. M. Atieh(16) |
Oral |
Phase I,
solid tumors |
9 enrolled; 5 OK for
toxicity eval. |
VPA: starting
at 10mg/kg/d every 8 hours until trough levels of 50-80;80-100;100-120
μg/ml; ATRA 60mg/m2 IV. |
1 patient had
a transient PSA decline. |
Discussion and Conclusions
HDAC inhibitors are a potential
treatment for cancer. Whether or not Valproic Acid is
an effective, worthwhile treatment for HRPC remains to be seen -- if at
least phase
II trials are ever done in HRPC men. There just isn't enough evidence
of responses from the limited information currently available to recommend
this as a treatment. Patients and their oncologists will have to make
their own assessment as to VPA's appropriateness for a given patient.
Some speculation - could mitoxantrone be used instead of epirubicin?
Is chronic dosing with VPA better than a combination therapy? Answers
to these questions will have to await some future clinical trial(s).
Two Options appear reasonable at this
time:
1. Take VPA "chronically" --
Xia et al (7) and Sharma et al (8) provide some guidance on this approach.
Sharma used doses of 10-25mg/kg. Compare this to the therapeutic doses and
levels of VPA used for seizure control:
15-60 mg/kg.
50-130 μg/mL(.3-.8 mmol/L per (13)
For a hypothetical 70kg patient this would
be 1050mg to 4200mg, so Sharma's dosing is probably conservative, but
starting at 10mg/kg would seem reasonable.
2. Use VPA as a chemotherapy
enhancer(synergistic with) per Münster, et al (13). The responding
prostate cancer patient was in the 100mg/kg group, while the phase II dose
was chosen to be 140mg/kg for 48 hours.
100mg/kg corresponds to 7000mg
for the hypothetical 70kg patient. But this dose level is only applied
for 48 hours and repeated every 3 weeks.
Combining a HDACi with other anticancer
agents may ultimately turn out to be the best approach as stated in the
review paper by J. E. Bolden et al (17).
Again, discuss this with your
oncologist to see if VPA and if one of these approaches would be appropriate
for you. Consider substituting, for example, mitoxantrone for the
epirubicin.
Author: Howard Hansen 11 October, 2007.
References
1. Marks P, Rifkind RA, Richon VM, Breslow R, Miller T,
Kelly WK., Histone deacetylases and cancer: causes and therapies, Nat Rev
Cancer. 2001 Dec;1(3):194-202.
2.
Marks PA, Richon VM, Miller T, Kelly WK,
Histone deacetylase inhibitors,
Adv. Cancer Res. 2004;91:137-68.
3. Vigushin DM, Coombes RC, Targeted histone
deacetylase inhibition for cancer therapy, Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2004
Mar;4(2):205-18.
4. Dokmanovic M, Marks PA., Prospects:
histone deacetylase inhibitors, J Cell Biochem. 2005 Oct 1;96(2):293-304.
5.
Garcia-Manero G, Issa JP, Histone deacetylase inhibitors: a review of their
clinical status as antineoplastic agents, Cancer Invest. 2005;23(7):635-42.
6. Morris MJ, Scher HI, Optimizing targeted therapy and
developing novel outcome measures for patients with advanced prostate cancer
at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003 Jun
27;46 Suppl:S21-31.
7. Xia Q, Sung J, Chowdhury W, Chen CL, Höti N,
Shabbeer S, Carducci M, Rodriguez R, Chronic administration of valproic acid
inhibits prostate cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo, Cancer Res. 2006
Jul 15;66(14):7237-44.
8. S. Sharma, N. Vogelzang, B. Wong, C. Adams, P. Manno,
K. Welborne, Y. Giraud, Preclinical and clinical investigation of histone
deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid given orally in androgen independent
prostate cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting
Proceedings Part I. Vol 24, No. 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 14614.
9. Atmaca A, Al-Batran SE, Maurer A, Neumann A,
Heinzel T, Hentsch B, Schwarz SE, Hövelmann S, Göttlicher M, Knuth A, Jäger
E, Valproic acid (VPA) in patients with refractory advanced cancer: a dose
escalating phase I clinical trial, Br J Cancer. 2007 Jul 16;97(2):177-82.
Epub 2007 Jun 19.
10. Kanzaki M, Kakinuma H, Kumazawa T, Inoue T, Saito
M, Narita S, Yuasa T, Tsuchiya N, Habuchi T., Low concentrations of the
histone deacetylase inhibitor, depsipeptide, enhance the effects of
gemcitabine and docetaxel in hormone refractory prostate cancer cells, Oncol
Rep. 2007 Apr;17(4):761-7.
11. Zhang Z, Stanfield J, Frenkel E, Kabbani W, Hsieh
JT., Enhanced therapeutic effect on androgen-independent prostate cancer by
depsipeptide (FK228), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in combination with
docetaxel, Urology. 2007 Aug;70(2):396-401.
12. P. N. Munster, D. C. Marchion, E. Bicaku, P.
Sullivan, C. Beam, J. Mahany, R. Lush, D. M. Sullivan, A. Daud, Phase I
Trial of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, Valproic Acid and the
Topoisomerase II Inhibitor, Epirubicin: A Clinical and Translational Study,
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. Vol 23,
No. 16S, Part I of II (June 1 Supplement) 2005: 3084.
13. Münster P, Marchion D, Bicaku E, Schmitt M, Lee JH,
DeConti R, Simon G, Fishman M, Minton S, Garrett C, Chiappori A, Lush R,
Sullivan D, Daud A., Phase I trial of histone deacetylase inhibition by
valproic acid followed by the topoisomerase II inhibitor epirubicin in
advanced solid tumors: a clinical and translational study, J Clin Oncol.
2007 May 20;25(15):1979-85. Comment in:
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):1955-6.
14. Kim MS, Blake M, Baek JH, Kohlhagen G, Pommier Y, Carrier F., Inhibition
of histone deacetylase increases cytotoxicity to anticancer drugs targeting
DNA, Cancer Res. 2003 Nov 1;63(21):7291-300.
15. Marchion DC, Bicaku E, Daud AI, Sullivan DM,
Munster PN, In vivo synergy between topoisomerase II and histone deacetylase
inhibitors: predictive correlates, Mol Cancer Ther. 2005
Dec;4(12):1993-2000.
16. D. M. Atieh, M. I. Milowsky, M. Cobham, J. Kaplan,
C. Smith, L. J. Gudas, D. M. Nanus, Phase I trial of a histone deacetylase
inhibitor (HDACI) and retinoid acid (RA) in patients (pts) with advanced
solid tumor malignancies,
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I.
Vol 24, No. 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 13114.
17. Jessica E. Bolden, Melissa J. Peart and Ricky W.
Johnstone, Anticancer activities of histone deacetylase inhibitors, Nature
Reviews Drug Discovery 5, 769-784 (September 2006) | doi:10.1038/nrd2133.
|