Second-Line Hormonal
Therapy
Definitions
LHRH - luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, for example
Lupron.
GnRH - gonadotropin releasing hormone, another designation
for Lupron-like testosterone suppressing drugs.
Introduction
Primary hormonal therapy can
be chemical suppression of testosterone via an LH-RH agonist such as Lupron,
Zoladex or one of several others that are marketed or via an orchiectomy,
which is surgically removing the testicles to suppress testosterone
production. The addition of the antiandrogen adds to this by blocking
the androgen receptors on the prostate cancer cells so they cannot respond
to the growth stimulation of testosterone or the testosterone precursors
coming from the adrenal glands (also see anti-androgen withdrawal below).
Sometimes a drug that suppresses the conversion of testosterone to
dihydrotestosterone in the prostate cancer cell is also added -- an example
of this type of drug are the 5α-reductase inhibitors
such as Proscar and the newer drug Advodart(dutasteride.)
A more general list of LH-RH agonists
includes: Lupron(leuprolide acetate),
Zoladex(goserelin acetate), buserelin, nafarelin acetate, Viadur (leuprolide
acetate implant), Trelstar (triptorelin),
and Eligard (leuprolide
acetate) and Plenaxis (abarelix). Plenaxis was withdrawn from the
market in 2005 and is only available to patients who were already on the
drug. Not all of these are FDA approved yet or they may never be
and all are not available or in general use everywhere. Trelstar has
recently been approved by the FDA in a 6 month formulation that will be
available in May 2010. This is in addition to the one and 3 month Trelstar.
A newcomer to first line and possibly second line
hormone therapy is degarelix (Firmagon(R))
a new gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, for the
treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer.
Examples of antiandrogens are Casodex(bicalutamide),
Eulexin (flutamide) or Nilandron(nilutamide). One can try sequencing
between these antiandrogens, e.g., Casodex to Nilandron to Flutamide before
moving to ketoconazole.
Once primary hormonal
therapy has failed, as indicated by a rising PSA or other evidence of
disease progression (such as bone metastases) a next option is called secondary hormonal
therapies. Usually patients remain on an LH-RH agonist, which controls the growth of any androgen responsive
prostate cancer cells that are still around.
The treatment sequence usually
recommended is as follows:
|
If stopping casodex, it might take 8 weeks before a
withdrawal response is seen due to long half-life. Otherwise, 4
weeks is probably sufficient |
Antiandrogen Withdrawal |
Stopping the antiandrogen and immediately starting
ketoconazole is an option. Clinical trials will usually require stopping
antiandrogens. |
ê
|
Sequencing secondary hormonal therapies
may extend survival. |
Secondary Hormonal Therapies |
Starting chemotherapy at this point or earlier is also
possible and may well be the best option for some. |
ê
|
Cytotoxic means kills cells and you can sequence
different chemotherapies and perhaps some other treatments. |
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy |
Or investigational drugs via clinical trial. This
is option at any time. |
If taking Casodex(bicalutamide),
Eulexin(flutamide) or Nilandron (nilutamide), stopping these, but staying on
the LH-RH agonist may precipitate a drop in PSA. This is normally the 1st
step if PSA is rising while on complete hormone blockade. Sometimes,
stopping the antiandrogen and immediately starting a secondary hormonal
manipulation is also done.
Withdrawal responses may also
be seen with megestrol acetate (Megace), estrogens(e.g., DES), progestational compounds and
retinoids1 In
the paper by Small et al2, 3 separate studies on AAWR were
summarized: 138 total patients, 29(21%) had a PSA decrease ≥ 50% after stopping flutamide -- the individual
values were 15%, 29% and 33%. The median durations of response were
3.5, 3.7+ and 5 months. Responders had a median time on flutamide of
18-28.3 months and non-responders had shorter median times on flutamide
ranging from 12-18.7 months. Men who were on both an LHRH agonist and on
flutamide has responses of 22% 18/82, but those who did monotherapy followed
by or preceeded by flutamide had responses of 11% (4/36). Responses >2 years
is mentioned. Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB
- trial 9583) documented a
randomized, prospective trial of antiandrogen withdrawal alone
compared with antiandrogen withdrawal plus high-dose ketoconazole (HDK).3 HDK consisted of ketoconazole, 400 mg p.o. t.i.d. and hydrocortisone, 40 mg p.o. q.d.
|
|
AAW Alone
(N=132) |
AAW + HDK
(N=128) |
P-value |
Notes |
|
≥
50% PSA Response |
13% |
27% |
0.012 |
|
|
Objective Response |
4% |
13% |
0.016 |
|
|
Survival |
16 Months |
15 months |
0.795 |
Patients were allowed to cross over from Anti-androgen
to Ketoconazole upon progression |
|
Grade 3,4 toxicity |
|
22% |
0.001 |
|
The antiandrogen withdrawal-alone arm,
had a ≥50% PSA response in only 13% of patients, with an objective response
rate of 4%. AAWR can also provide an objective response as seen by the
4% response rate. There was no
difference in survival in early versus later use of HDK.
In yet another study of AAWR,
a prospective SWOG (SW Oncology Group) study (SWOG 9426)4 with
data from multiple institutions as opposed to primarily single institution
studies, enrolled 259 patients.
|
|
Flutamide (N=46%) |
Bicalutamide (N=48%) |
Nilandron (N=6%) |
Notes/ overall results |
|
≥
50% PSA Response by AA
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
N=259, but only 218 evaluated at time of abstract.
Total RR 15% |
|
Radiographic Responses |
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
None |
|
Progression Free Interval |
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
Median was 3 months but 23% has 12-months. |
|
Overall
median survival after AAW |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Median was 20 months. 126 patients had died. |
NA = not available in the abstract.
This
abstract was presented in May 2002 at ASCO. Until the full trial
results are published, there isn't a whole lot of information available
comparing AA. The response rate PSA-wise of only 15% is modest at
best.
References
1. HI Scher and G JCM Kolvenbag, "The Anti-Androgen Withdrawal Syndrome in
Relapsed Prostate Cancer," Eur Urol 1997;31[suppl 2]: 3-7.
2. EJ Small and NJ Vogelzang, "Second-Line Hormonal Therapy for Advanced
Prostate Cancer: A shifting Paradigm," Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.
15, No. 1(January), 1997: pp 382-388.
3. Small E.J., Halabi S., Picus J.,
et al. "A prospective randomized trial of antiandrogen withdrawal alone or
antiandrogen withdrawal in combination with high-dose ketoconazole in
androgen independent prostate cancer patients - results of CALGB 9583",
ASCO 2001 abstract 695.
4. A. O Sartor, C Tangen, M
Hussain, M Eisenberger, E D Crawford,
Anti-androgen withdrawal in prostate cancer: results from SWOG 9426.
ASCO 2002 Abstract 785.
Scher and Kelly's paper on flutamide
withdrawal in 1993 was followed by the Small et al paper below.
Small E.J., Carroll P.R., "Prostate-specific antigen
decline after Casodex withdrawal - evidence for an antiandrogen withdrawal
syndrome", Urology, Volume: 43, (1994), pp. 408-410.
The following two references provide excellent
overviews of secondary hormonal therapies. W. Oh's, being the most recent
and therefore up to date.
WK Oh, "Secondary Hormonal Therapies in the Treatment
of Prostate Cancer," Urology 60[Suppl 3A]:87-93, 2002.
Richie JP, Anti-androgens and
other hormonal therapies for prostate cancer, Urology 1999 Dec;54(6A Suppl):15-8.
[Top]
The paper on
low-dose corticosteroids is on its own page. Low-dose corticosteriods can be used as an
independent second line hormone therapy. They are
often combined with chemotherapy or with ketoconazole or Aminoglutethimide(Cytaden).
Triamcinolone
is one glucocorticoid to consider and is discussed on its own page also.
[Top]
Casodex (Bicalutamide) is a nonsteroidal antiandrogen.
The currently FDA approved dose is 50mg/day and it is usually used in
conjunction with an LH-RH agonist. Some studies are also being done or
have been done using Casodex as a monotherapy for a 1st time hormone therapy
and doses for this use have generally been 150mg to 200mg/day. Casodex is an orally administered drug with hot flashes(23%) and nausea(21%)
being the most common side effects.
Note: Consider sequencing from Casodex to
Nilandron to
Flutamide before moving to HDK/HC. Sometimes a response is seen if the dose
of Casodex is increased from 50 to 150mg/day.
High Dose Casodex(HDC) - bicalutamide
Low dose casodex = 50mg/day. High
dose casodex = 150 mg/day, although 200mg/day is occasionally prescribed.
High-Dose Casodex for
HRPC(androgen-independent prostate cancer) - Summary Table 1,2,3
a No prior antiandrogen.
In the study by Kucuk et al2, all
patients had no prior chemotherapy and no prior antiandrogen. Result-wise
they found palliation of pain but no complete or partial responses, but
there was the above noted 20% PSA response. Median survival time was 15
months.
The study by Scher et al3
had who were androgen dependent, androgen independent, with
or without previous flutamide but the outcomes were reported separately.
Considering just the
androgen-independent group, "clinical benefit was observed in patients who
had previously progressed on flutamide, independent of the response to
flutamide withdrawal. Patients who had progressed on a gonadotropin-releasing
hormone (GnRH) analog alone had a low response proportion, whereas those who
progressed after two or more hormone therapies did not respond."
References
1. Joyce R., Fenton M.A., Rode P., et al.
"High dose bicalutamide for androgen independent prostate cancer - effect of
prior hormonal therapy", J Urol, Volume: 159, (1998), pp. 149-153.
2. Kucuk O, Fisher E, Moinpour CM, Coleman D, Hussain MH, Sartor AO, Chatta
GS, Lowe BA, Eisenberger MA, Crawford ED, Phase II trial of bicalutamide in patients with
advanced prostate cancer in whom conventional hormonal therapy failed: a
Southwest Oncology Group study (SWOG 9235), Urology 2001 Jul;58(1):53-8.
3. Scher H.I., Liebertz C., Kelly W.K., et
al. "Bicalutamide for advanced prostate cancer - the natural versus treated
history of disease", J Clin Oncol, Volume: 15, (1997), pp. 2928-2938.
Megestrol
acetate
Megestrol acetate is a steroidal antiandrogen with progestational
activity. For androgen independent patients, responses are very low with
objective responses of only 0-9%(as an antiandrogen) and Dawson et al
reported PSA decreases of 8-13% and few objective responses. Side
effects noted were thrombophlebitis and fluid retention. Oh, notes
that based on the above results, megestrol acetate should not be used for
HRPC men.
Dawson N.A., Conaway M.,
Halabi S., et al. "A randomized study comparing standard versus moderately
high dose megestrol acetate for patients with advanced prostate carcinoma -
cancer and leukemia group B study 9181", Cancer, Volume: 88, (2000), pp.
825-834.
[Top]
Testosterone is, for the most
part, secreted from the testicles. However, about 10% can also be
produced by the adrenal glands in the form of androgen precursors. Even in
hrpc men, there are prostate cancer cells retaining sensitivity to androgens
and therefore, reducing the output from the adrenal glands can result in a
PSA reduction. See the following pages for more information.
Ketoconazole - both
High Dose(HDK) and Low Dose(LDK).
The brand name is Nizoral and there is a generic version available. There is
also an Intermediate-Dose which is 300mg tid. A table summarizing study
results of high dose, low dose and intermediate dose ketoconazole as well as
high dose ketoconazole combined with other agents is at
ketotable.
Aminoglutethimide (Cytadren).
Unfortunately, this drug is no longer available.
Estrogens and anti-estrogens can also play a role as second
line hormone therapies. DES information is detailed at
Estrogens (e.g., DES).
Anti-estrogens, in the form of tamoxifen
200mg/m2 did show some PSA response. A newer drug, Evista (raloxifene), may have a much greater effect
-- it targets the estrogen receptor beta while tamoxifen targets ERalpha.
The Cedars-Sinai Prostate Cancer Center has done some clinical trial work
with Evista. Evista is already
FDA-approved for treating osteoporosis in women.
PC Spes - This herbal product
is no longer available, having been withdrawn by the manufacturer BotanicLab.
The link will take you to some of the information that was available on this
preparation. A number of herbal products are now on the market claiming to
have the same ingredients as PC-Spes -- presumably without prescription drug
contamination as was found with PC-Spes. These include PC Hope, PC Plus, PC
Res and, likely, others.
Of course, at some point, PC Spes might return
to the market in a contamination free form. A product being developed
by Active Botanicals, Ltd. (UK) is
called PCSPES2. See Oncology Reports 2008 for details on a phase I study
with 18 HRPC patients. Diarrhea was one of their biggest problems and
required a dose adjustment(8 out of the first 10 patients at one month and
only 2 out of the last 8 due to an improved dosing schedule). At one month, 7 out of 10 patients had a drop
in their PSA doubling time or PSA velocity, which was still apparent in 4
out of 5 patients still on trial at three months and all three patients
still on trial at six months. Whether or not they will proceed to a phase II
trial is unknown at this time.
Phase I
trial of PC-Spes2 in advanced hormone refractory prostate cancer
Authors:
Majid Shabbir, Julie Love, Bruce Montgomery, Oncol Rep. 2008 Mar;19
(3):831-5 18288423 (P,S,E,B). Department of Urology, Frimley Park Hospital,
Portsmouth Road, Surrey GU16 7UJ, UK.
majidshabbir@hotmail.com.
Howard Hansen 1/3/2003.
Updates on 8/4/07 and 8/28/08.
[Top]
|