Home
Up
What's New
News
What To Do First
On Line Support List
Proven Treatments
Potential Treatments
Symptoms Mgmt
Diagnostic Tests
Information Resources
FAQ

Support HRPCa.org

 

 

 

Revlimid® (lenalidomide)

Author: Howard Hansen

Definitions

Revlimid® - Trade name of an immunomodulatory thalidomide analogue.

Lenalidomide - Generic name of Revlimid®; CC5013 is an earlier name.

Introduction

Thalidomide is an anti-angiogenic drug that is FDA approved for multiple myeloma and malignant cachexia.  Lenalidomide/ Revlimid® is an immunomodulatory thalidomide analogue that is FDA approved for treating a subtype of myelodysplastic syndrome and multiple myeloma. 

Both thalidomide and Revlimid are used "off-label" for HRPC. Off-label use is legal as long as your doctor explains the risks, benefits, and alternatives. An excellent review article by Jeanny B. Aragon-Ching, et al.(1) covers both thalidomide and Revlimid. See also an earlier article by E. Crane and A. List (1b).  While thalidomide has been extensively studied in HRPC and other cancers, Revlimid is relatively new and there are fewer clinical trials information to go on as far as use. 

 

Revlimid is supposed to offer an improved side-effect profile as well as having more potent immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic activity than thalidomide. A list of notable side effects of thalidomide would include somnolence, constipation, venous thromboembolism, peripheral neuropathy and fatigue.  With Revlimid, there is supposed to be less peripheral neuropathy and pro-thrombotic effects.  However that does not mean they still don't exist to some extent -- as indicated by the pro-thrombotic effects when combined with dexamethasone. 

 

Due to the somnolence concern with thalidomide, it is normally taken at bedtime.  For Revlimid, at least one of the clinical trials (RA Sharma et al (2)) had the patients taking it in the morning.  So potentially, we have a drug that is more potent than its predecessor and has fewer side effects.

 

Below, are a summary of phase I and II clinical trials for Revlimid as well as the combinations of Revlimid plus taxotere and Revlimid plus Leukine (gm-csf) -- with the focus on HRPC disease. Side effects are noted as available in the tables.

Phase I Results of Single Agent lenalidomide

A Phase I study of Revlimid by itself was published in 2006 by RA Sharma, et al, for patients with solid malignancies. (2)  Of the 3 dose cohorts, they recommended II and III for further trials.

Table 1. Phase I studies of single agent lenalidomide - some HRPC patients.

Reference

Phase of

trial.

No. Pts.

Type of

Cancer

Doses

Results

Results

RA Sharma

et al., Eur J. Can 2006 (2)

Phase I, 2 center, open-label, 55 pts., 26 completed the study.

 

Once daily, 12 weeks.

Metastatic solid

tumors. Refractory to

std. chemos.

(I) 25 mg daily for the first 7 d, the daily dose increased by 25 mg each week up to a maximum daily dose of 150 mg;

(II) 25mg daily for 21 d followed by a 7-d rest period, the 4-week cycle repeated for 3 cycles; (III) 10 mg daily continuously.

Cohort I

 

Grade 3/4

Neutropenia, 4 Pts.

Cohort II

 

Grade 3/4 Neutropenia, 4 Pts.

TM Tohnya et al., ASCO 2006 (3)

I, 45 Pts., 37 male, 8 female.

Refractory metastatic. 36 of the 37 males had Prostate Cancer.

5mg, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35mg. 40mg planned.

 

Daily dose changed to 21 of 28 days.

Grade 1 or 2 toxicity: nausea

(43%); myalgia

(38%); pruritis/rash (54%);

fatigue

(38%);
neutropenia (30%).

Grade 3 or 4 toxicity:

nausea

(43%);

myalgia

(38%); pruritis/rash (54%);

fatigue

(38%);
neutropenia (30%).

 

Reference 2 continues with the following list of results: "Two patients experienced a grade 3 hypersensitivity rash.  In 2 patients with predisposing medical factors, grade 3 cardiac dysrhythmia was recorded. Grade 1 neurotoxicity was detected in 6 patients. One complete and two partial radiological responses were measured by computed tomography scanning; 8 patients had stable disease after 12 weeks of treatment. Fifteen patients remained on treatment as named patients; 1 with metastatic melanoma remains in clinical remission 3.5 years from trial entry."

 

 

Phase I trials of lenalidomide and taxotere (docetaxel).

Table 2. Phase I trials of lenalidomide and taxotere - HRPC/AIPC patients. Taxotere and thalidomide have previously shown activity in AIPC, hence providing rationale for this trial.

Reference

Phase of

trial.

No. Pts.

Type of

Cancer and characteristics

Doses and schedule

Results - tumor

Results -

toxicity

RA Moss, et al,

ASCO PCa Symposium 2007, abstract #89 (4).

AIPC,

I, 21 pts, 19 evaluable as of 1/31/07.(4)

Measurable

disease or rising PSA. No more than 2 prior chemotherapies.

 

8 pts (42%) had received prior chemotherapy (3 with 2 prior).

Taxotere:

q3 wks., 60mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2. Prednisone 5mg BID.

 

Lenalidomide: 14 of 21 days with escalating doses of 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg and 25 mg.

Ten pts (52.6%) had a > 50% decline in serum PSA with a median duration of 137 days.

 

13 pts with measurable disease, 5 (38.5%) achieved a partial response (PR) with 1 of these pts having had previous chemotherapy and 7 pts (53.9%) had stable disease with 4 of these pts having had previous chemotherapy.

DVT: 1pt at 10mg.

 

Fatigue: 5 pt, 3 at 15mg, 1 gr 2, 2 gr 3;

1 at 20mg, gr 2, 1 at 25mg gr 2.

 

Neuropathy: 1 pt at 15mg, gr 3.

 

Neutropenia: 6 pt, 2 pt at 10mg, gr 2; 3 pt at 15mg, gr 3; 1 pt at 20mg gr 3.

 

Pneumonia: 1 pt at 15mg.

 

Prophylactic anticoagulation used at investigators discretion.

 

 

 

MM Cooney et al, ASCO PCa

2006 (5). *

I, 7 pts, 6 male and 1 female.  There was 1 PCa patient as of this abstract.

Advanced, solid tumors.

Taxotere: day 1, q21 days. Lenalidomide orally days 1 through 14 of the 21 day cycle. 

-

5 patients;

Taxotere 75mg/m2 + lenalidomide at 5 mg days 1-14: two dose limiting toxicities:

neutropenic fever and grade 3 nausea and vomiting.

 

7 patients; Taxotere 50mg/m2; lenalidomide 5mg days 1-14: 4 of 6 had grade 3/4 neutropenia.

SL Sanborn et al, 2007 ASCO annual mtg. (6).

I, 19 pts (14 male, 5 female).

Of the 14 males, 7 were PCa pts. 

Advanced solid tumors. Fourteen patients had zero or one prior treatment regimens (range 0 to 6).

Taxotere: day 1, q21 days. Lenalidomide orally days 1-14 of the 21 day cycle.  ***

For 75mg/m2 = 5mg lenalidomide days 1-14: 7 stable disease; 1 PCa pts > 95% drop in PSA.

Taxotere 75mg/m2 q3wks + Lenalidomide 5mg days 1-14: 8 of 9 grade 3/4 neutropenia; 1 grade 3 nausea/vomiting, one grade 4 neutropenia with fever. G-CSF added no neutropenia next 7 pts. **

 

* with the prevalence of grade 3/4 neutropenia they are exploring adding g-csf on day 2 of each cycle.

**Other grade 3 and 4 toxicities included leukopenia (31%), lymphopenia (19%), as well as nausea, vomiting, fatigue, anemia, infection, hyponatremia, and hypokalemia (6% each.)

*** Escalating dose to 75mg/m2 and 10mg plus pegfilgrastim support day 2.

 

Phase II Studies of Revlimid

 

Table 3. Revlimid with GM-CSF (leukine) - HRPC patients.

 

Reference

Phase of

trial.

No. Pts.

Type of

Cancer and characteristics

Doses and schedule

Results - tumor

Results -

toxicity

Dreicer R, et al, ASCO 2007, abs 15515 (7)

I/II,

HRPC, no prior immunotherapy or chemotherapy.

GM-CSF: 250 µg SC three times weekly along with lenalidomide 25 mg/day orally on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. Primary endpoints were safety and objective and PSA responses.

13 of 17 pts (76%) experienced a reduction in PSA (<20% 2/17; 20-40% 7/17, >50% 4/17)

 

Objective RR 2 17 pts. 

 

Grade 1-2 toxicities for all 17 pts included neutropenia 20%, thrombocytopenia 13%, diarrhea 43%, dizziness 25%, and fatigue 90%.

 

Three pts developed Grade 4 toxicities (PE, neutropenia, and emesis).

SC = subcutaneously; µg = microgram; RR = response rate; Objective RR: RR of measurable disease other than bone mets; PE = pulmonary embolism; emesis = vomiting. 

 

Other safety information

 

The US FDA has had a "black" box warning placed on the labels of Revlimid bottles.  This warns of 1, potential birth defects (similar to thalidomide); 2, a risk of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia; 3, a risk of developing deep venous thrombosis (DVTs) and pulmonary embolisms (PE).  The DVTs and PEs may potentially be avoided by therapeutically anti-coagulating with coumadin or a low-molecular weight heparin(8.) Reference (8) says, "VTE rates were 8.5% to 75% in multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide and dex or erythropoietin; rates were <3.4% when aspirin prophylaxis was added."

 

Thalidomide vs Revlimid

 

There appears to be enough phase I data available to provide dose and schedule guidelines for Revlimid - except where it is combined with taxotere.  Hopefully this will be sorted out in further phase II clinical trials (see table 2.)

 

Taxotere and thalidomide is much better characterized, an example of which is found in references 9 and 10.  In that study, there were 59 patients, taxotere weekly 3 out of 4 weeks at 30mg/m2.  Patients were chemo-naive, but metastatic AIPC. 35% (6 of 17) of the patients receiving only taxotere and 53% (19 of 36) of those receiving both docetaxel and thalidomide had a PSA decline of at least 50%. Thrombotic events have been seen in the combination arm for which LMWH was then used.  Updated in 2005, an analysis of this trial showed an improvement in the 18-month survival in the combination arm vs. taxotere alone arm (69.3% versus 47.2%, P < 0.05), with a median survival time of 25.9 months in the combination arm versus 14.7 months in the single agent arm [76,77].

 

Until phase II trials are done with Revlimid and Taxotere, one might want to go slowly in adopting this drug. However, the results for (4) look promising. The results from the phase II study combining Leukine (gm-csf) and Revlimid look promising enough at this time to be worthy of consideration.

 

Author: Howard Hansen 18 December 2007

 

References

 

1. Jeanny B. Aragon-Ching, Haiqing Li, Erin R. Gardner, and William D. Figg, Thalidomide Analogues as Anticancer Drugs, Recent Patents Anticancer Drug Discov. 2007 June ; 2(2): 167–174.

 

1b. Edward Crane‌ & Alan List‌, Lenalidomide: an immunomodulatory drug, Future Oncology Oct 2005, Vol. 1, No. 5, Pages 575 - 583, doi:10.2217/14796694.1.5.575).


2.  Sharma RA, Steward WP, Daines CA, Knight RD, O'Byrne, Toxicity profile of the immunomodulatory thalidomide analogue, lenalidomide: phase I clinical trial of three dosing schedules in patients with solid malignancies, Eur J Cancer. 2006 Sep;42(14):2318-25. Epub 2006 Aug 8.

 

3. T. M. Tohnya, J. Gulley, P. Arlene, A. Sparreboom, J. Venitz, C. Parker, K. Fedenko, H. Parnes, W. D. Figg, W. Dahut, Phase I study of lenalidomide, a novel thalidomide analog, in patients with refractory metastatic cancer.
Citation: Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. Vol 24, No. 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 13038.

 

See also: Tohnya TM, Ng SS, Dahut WL, et al. A phase I study of oral CC-5013 (lenalidomide, Revlimid), a thalidomide derivative, in patients with refractory metastatic cancer. Clin Prostate Cancer 2004;2:241–3. [PubMed: 15072608]. This is an earlier status of this study.

 

4. R. A. Moss, S. G. Mohile, G. Shelton, J. Melia, D. P. Petrylak, A phase I open-label study using lenalidomide and docetaxel in androgen independent prostate cancer (AIPC), Meeting: 2007 Prostate Cancer Symposium, Abstract No: 89.

 

A preliminary report on this phase I trial was given at ASCO 2006 annual meeting(Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. Vol 24, No. 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 14618.)

 

5. M. M. Cooney, J. Gibbons, J. Brell, P. Savvides, S. Krishnamurthi, A. Dowlati, N. Horvath, K. Robertson, P. Fu, S. C. Remick,  Phase I trial of daily lenalidomide and docetaxel given every three weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors,  2006 ASCO Prostate Cancer Symposium, Abstract No: 265.

 

6. S. L. Sanborn, M. Cooney, J. Gibbons, J. Brell, P. Savvides, S. Krishnamurthi, J. Bokar, N. Horvath, A. Ness, S. Remick, Phase I trial of daily lenalidomide and docetaxel given every three weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. Vol 25, No. 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2007: 3570.

 

7. R. Dreicer, J. Garcia, S. Smith, P. Elson, P. Triozzi, S. Hodnick, B. Rini, E. Klein,  Phase I/II trial of GM-CSF and lenalidomide in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. Vol 25, No. 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2007: 15515.

 

8. C. Angelotta, A. J. Lurie, A. J. Lurie, P. R. Yarnold, S. Singhal, J. Mehta, E. A. Lyons, C. L. Bennett, Black box warning on lenalidomide-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) in off-label setting: A preemptive and unusual safety initiative, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. Vol 24, No. 18S (June 20 Supplement), 2006: 6074.

 

9. Figg WD, Arlen P, Gulley J, et al. A randomized phase II trial of docetaxel (taxotere) plus thalidomide in androgen-independent prostate cancer. Semin Oncol 2001;28:62–6. [PubMed: 11685731]

10. Retter AS, Ando Y, Price DK, et al. Follow-up analysis of a randomized phase II study of docetaxel and thalidomide in androgen-independent prostate cancer: Updated survival data and stratification by CYP2C19 mutation status. Proceedings of the Prostate Cancer Symposium. 2005 Abstract 265
 


 

This information is provided for educational purposes only and does not replace or amend professional medical advice. Unless otherwise stated and credited, the content of www.hrpca.org is by and the opinion of and copyright © 2001-2008 by H. Hansen. All Rights Reserved.  Our policy regarding privacy,  right to reprint and contact information are at About Us. We are a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit public charity.