|
Nilutamide (Nilandron)
A Seldom Used Alternative Antiandrogen
for HRPC Patients
It can also be used as a 2nd line hormonal therapy
Author: Howard Hansen
Date: 25 November 2008
Introduction
Nilandron (nilutamide)
is a nonsteriodal androgen receptor antagonist . It has an affinity for
androgen receptors, but not for progestogen, estrogen or glucocorticoid
receptors. Its half life is 56 hours with peak plasma levels being reached
within 3 hours of a single dose. Nilutamide has a chemical structure
unique from that of Casodex
(bicalutamide) and Eulexin (flutamide.) Casodex is frequently used along
with LHRH agonists such as Lupron or Zoladex for combined androgen blockade
in hormone sensitive men.
For an overview of
hormonal therapy listen to a talk given by Ian Tannock at the ESMO 2008
conference in Stockholm, On the Changing Face of Hormonal Therapy go to
http://esmo.onsite.tv/data/popup_index.htm?presentationPath=session3/presentation1
To place nilutamide
use in a 2nd line hormonal therapy context follow a sequence of hormonal therapies following mostly the
one found in a paper by B. Seruga and
Tannock (1) proceeding as follows:
1. Start with LHRH
agonist monotherapy (Lupron or Zoladex). ==> failure.
2. Add an
antiandrogen such as Casodex ==> response, then failure or no response.
3. Withdrawal of the
antiandrogen ==> if PSA decreases and/or clinical regression of tumors =
response or if PSA continues to increase = failure.
4. The next step is
to treat with ketoconazole and a glucocorticoid such as hydrocortisone or a
glucocorticoid such as dexamethasone alone.
5. Next would be to
try an estrogen such as diethylstilbestrol (DES) or transdermal estrogen
patches (the estrogen could be used instead of ketoconazole or
simultaneously with it.)
6. Or one could add
an alternative antiandrogen from the one originally used. Nilutamide is one
possibility.
There are several
clinical trials involving nilutamide as an alternative antiandrogen in HRPC
men. Table 1 below summarizes each of these studies.
Table 1. Nilutamide
as a 2nd Line Hormone Therapy. Review of Trials.
| Study |
No. Patients |
Nilutamide Dose(usual dose is 150-300mg/day) |
PSA Response
(≥ 50% Decrease) |
Median Duration of PSA Response |
Pain Response |
| (2)Desai A et al Urology 2001(a) |
14, retrospective |
12 pts: 150mg/day;
2 pts: 300mg/day. |
7 of 14
(50%).
(b) |
11 months (range 2-28+) |
4 of 6 pts with bone pain had subjective improvements. |
| (3) Kassouf W, J. Urol. 2003
(c)
(d) |
28 |
23 pts 200mg/day.
5 pts 300mg/day. |
12 pts (48% ≥ 50% decrease)
6 pts (21% < 50% decrease.)
8 (29%) sustained a PSA response
(greater than 50% decrease) beyond 3 months (range 3 to 21). |
26 mos. (range 4-44.) This was called "followup). For responders
only median followup time was 28 mos(range 8-33). |
|
|
(4)A. O. Sartor et al, 2004 ASCO Annual mtg.
abs #4762
|
12,
radiographically positive metastatic
disease was present in 33% (4/12).
(e) |
150mg/day (the FDA approved amt.) |
4/12 ≥ 50%decline,
(33%)
9/12
had some PSA decline. |
Median progression free survival was 7 months (range 1–36+).
(f) |
|
| (5)Nakabayashi M et al, BJU Int. 2005
(g) |
45, retrospective with AIPC disease. |
150mg/day(most pts). |
18/45 patients (40%) ≥ 50% decline.
|
Responders median time to progression was 4.4 (0.31-44.7)
months. |
|
| (6) 6. Davis NB et al, BJU Int. 2005
(h) |
19 with 16 evaluable. |
150mg/day for ≥ 8 wkls. |
3 partial responses; 13 had progressive disease. |
- |
Study discontinued following a planned interim analysis.
Reason: no apparent activity. |
| (7) Akduman B et al |
4 case reports. See the actual report for details.
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Seven had been
treated with prior bicalutamide), five with both bicalutamide and
flutamide, and two had received bicalutamide and prior chemotherapy.
(b) 3 patients (20%)
had brief PSA responses of less than 50%.
(c) All patients had
previously received at least 1 antiandrogen (flutamide, then bicalutamide in
11 pts or
bicalutamide 50mg 1st, then 150mg in 17 pts.)
In addition, all
patients had medical or surgical castration, which failed. All patients had
to have failed antiangrogen withdrawal.
(d) PSA response
rate (≥ 50% Decrease) in patients who had a previous antiandrogen
withdrawal response (5 of 5 pts - 100%) vs a non-response (3 of 17 pts,
18%.) 200mg vs 300mg/day - no significant difference seen in PSA
response.
(e) Half of pts had
previously used an antiandrogen (5 of 12 bicalutamide, 1/12 with flutamide.)
One patient had
CT evidence of progression without PSA
progression. Progression-free survival of more than 6 months was noted in
both antiandrogen (4/6) and non-antiandrogen (2/6) pretreated patients.
(f) 3/12 patients
stopped taking nilutamide due to toxicities.
(g) Responders
seemed to be mostly those who had received an LH-RH agonist or had had an
orchidectomy as their 1st line hormone treatment.
(h) Patients had
radiographic or PSA progression on at least one antiandrogen (not nilutamide)
despite continued androgen suppression and standard antiandrogen withdrawal
periods. Median Gleason score 7 (6-9 month range). Median number of previous
2nd line therapies was 2 (1-4 range). All had failed bicalutamide. 13
of 16 had radiographically evident disease, 9 with bone metastases and 4
with measurable metastases.
Side Effects
Nilutamide has a few
unique, reversible side effects:
-
Light-dark
adaptation disorders (30%).
-
Alcohol
intolerance (5%).
-
A severe, but
rare interstitial pneumonitis (< 2%).
Other side effects
from various papers are:
-
Reference (5)
noted that in 20% of the patients, the most common reversible side
effect was mild to moderate visual adaptation effects.
-
Reference (6)
listed the following side effects: No grade 3/4 toxicity; the most
frequent grade 1/2 toxicities were constipation (three), sensory
neuropathy (four), fatigue (six), and visual changes (two) involving
transiently altered colour vision and sensitivity to light,
respectively.
Discussion
Most often, it
appears that the FDA approved dose of 150mg/day of nilutamide is being used,
although some studies have used 200 and 300mg/day. Patients might have
a better chance of a PSA response if they did have an antiandrogen
withdrawal response while taking bicalutamide. Also there might be a
better response for patients who did respond to bicalutamide longer.
One trial reported
here seems to have had a negative outcome (Davis NB (6).) Why they did not
see any activity of nilandron in their trial is not readily apparent.
Perhaps it was the extent of the metastatic disease present.
Overall, PSA
responses ranged from zero to 50%. There was few analyses of measurable
disease and there were several retrospective analyses as opposed to the
preferred prospective clinical trial. Also, most of the studies had very few
patients.
References
1. B. Seruga and I.
F. Tannock, The changing face of hormonal therapy for prostate cancer, Ann
Oncol 2008 19: vii79-vii85; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn477.
2. Desai A, Stadler WM, Vogelzang NJ,
Nilutamide: possible utility as a second-line hormonal agent, Urology. 2001
Dec;58(6):1016-20.
PMID: 11744479.
3. Kassouf W, Tanguay S, Aprikian AG,
Nilutamide as second line hormone therapy for prostate cancer after androgen
ablation fails,
J Urol. 2003 May;169(5):1742-4.
Comment in:
J Urol. 2003 May;169(5):1745-6.
PMID: 12686822
4.
A. O. Sartor,
D. Lifsey, A. C. Dwight, Surprising activity of nilutamide in
post-castration progressive prostate cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology,
2004 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition). Vol 22, No 14S
(July 15 Supplement), 2004: 4762.
5.
Nakabayashi M, Regan MM, Lifsey D, Kantoff PW, Taplin ME, Sartor O, Oh WK,
Efficacy of nilutamide as secondary hormonal therapy in androgen-independent
prostate cancer, BJU Int. 2005
Oct;96(6):783-6. PMID: 16153200.
6. Davis NB, Ryan CW, Stadler WM,
Vogelzang NJ,
A phase II study of nilutamide in men with prostate cancer after the failure
of flutamide or bicalutamide therapy, BJU Int. 2005
Oct;96(6):787-90.
PMID: 16153201.
7. Bülent Akduman,
MD; E. David Crawford, MD; Ali M. Ziada, MD, Long-Term Follow-up of Four
Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated With Nilutamide After Failure
of Other Antiandrogens. The full article is at
http://www.pcaw.com/info_articles/articles/follow-up.html
Anecdotal Reports
Feb 4, 2008 hrpca post by RV: I tried Nilandron as a 2nd line HT and it put me in
the hospital with interstitial pneumonia. It was pretty scary. I wore an oxygen supply for a
few months. But, thank goodness, the condition was reversible and I was back
to normal in about 6 months. I knew about the small risk, but did not think it
would apply to me. Here's the timeline:
10/08/05 Changed from 50 mg/day Casodex to 150
mg/day Nilandron
11/21/05 Stopped 150 mg/day Nilandron –
Hospitalized: Pneumonitis
12/15/05 First appointment with Oncologist. Resumed
50 mg day Casodex.
Another patient (HK) reports on his experience with
nilutamide: Nilandron and Lupron combo has now lowered my psa to 5.6
from over 13 after 5 weeks. This is exceptionally good news. I wear amber
glasses at night to drive and then have no problem. Energy is good, I walk 2
miles a day, mental processes not as sharp
as they once were but maybe just due to being 62 now.
JL says, I had good results with Nilandron with no
side effects. 6 months after stopping Casodex PSA went from 2 to 18.
Nilandron dropped PSA to 4 within a month or two. Overall, it was 10 months
before PSA was up to 14. Regimen during that time was Lupron, Avodart, and
Nilandron, nothing else.
DJ's experience. My Experience with Nilandron was
that it worked to lower my psa right away. I did not experience any of the
side effects except liver toxicity. My liver numbers were already
elevated from casodex 150mg when I started nilandron. Though My liver
numbers are good now, I never did restart, though I have considered it.
Author: Howard Hansen
Most recent update: 8 February 2009 |