|
Leukine® (GM-CSF) &
Leukine Combinations
Leukine plus Retinoids,
Leukine plus Thalidomide
Possible Role in
Extending the Off Period During Intermittent Chemotherapy
These combinations may also be useful in delaying the start of
chemotherapy.
Leukine plus High Dose Ketoconazole and Hydrocortisone may also be used
for both delaying the start of chemotherapy or extending the off time from
chemotherapy, but hasn't been specifically tested in those applications. See
reference #23 and summary below.
Introduction
In its simplest form, intermittent chemotherapy means being on treatment for
a certain number of weeks or months, having a good response as indicated by
at least a 50% decrease in PSA and/or a PSA < 4ng/ml and then stopping any
treatment while the body recovers from the treatment. TM Beer et al (1)
published the results of a study on intermittent chemotherapy in hrpca
patients which indicated improvement of fatigue and other chronic toxicities
of chemotherapy.
However, for the majority of patients, some form of active treatment is
probably necessary when stopping chemotherapy in order to provide an
extended time off treatment. Extended time off might be accomplished by
having a significant decline in PSA as in the Beer study or by smaller
declines or just stabilization of PSA. Even a reduction of PSADT might prove
beneficial.
The focus of this paper is on the use of GM-CSF(Leukine, or
granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor); retinoids (forms of
vitamin A); combinations of Leukine and retinoids; Leukine in combination
with thalidomide for providing an extended off chemotherapy duration and
leukine combined with high dose ketoconazole with hydrocortisone.
Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer patients face a real dilemma in
attempting to extend their survival. On the one hand, they desire a
reasonable level of quality of life (QOL) and on the other hand they want to
survive as long as possible which may require the use of cytotoxic
chemotherapies which may impact/lessen quality of life.
Second line hormonal therapy followed by sequential chemotherapies (e.g.,
taxotere/prednisone(or emcyt) to taxol/emcyt to mitoxantrone/prednisone to
taxotere/carboplatin to taxotere/high dose calcitriol, etc.) might offer
hrpca patients a chance to extend survival. The impact of sequential
chemotherapies on quality of life is difficult to quantify as some patients
tolerate the treatments very well, while others are greatly impacted by side
effects such as ocular toxicity, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue and others.
These may or may not resolve once chemotherapy has stopped. Intermittent
chemotherapy in conjunction with sequential therapies may combine the best
of both worlds – quality of life and extended survival.
There are at least 3 ways of maintaining disease control during the
off-phase of chemotherapy. The 1st is that used in TM Beer et al’s study
(1), i.e., no treatment (27% of his phase II study patients met the criteria
for intermittent chemotherapy) which is an ideal situation. A second option
is to use/re-use secondary hormonal treatments in the off-chemotherapy phase
(e.g., ketoconazole, nilutamide, estrogen patches or DES), with possible low
response rates and duration of response. The third option is to expose the
prostate cancer cells to a totally new, non-chemotherapy agent such as
Leukine. Retinoids such as all-trans retinoic acid or 13-cis retinoic acid
may also play a role here as a way of increasing the effectiveness of GM-CSF
(2), although as single agents, their activity for HRPC is limited.
Conceptually, if the retinoids induce differentiation, then the GM-CSF might
be enhanced in effectiveness against the prostate cancer cells(2). Recently,
thalidomide in combination with leukine has entered the picture for this
application(18). It is also possible that the combination of leukine
(250mcg/m2) and high dose ketoconazole (HDK) with hydrocortisone could also
be used.
Four drugs will be discussed here. They are:
For immune system modulation:
Leukine (GM-CSF, Sargramostim)
For induction of differentiation:
Vesanoid (tretinoin -- all-trans retinoic acid or "ATRA".)
Accutane (13-cis retinoic acid.)
(Not discussed here is calcitriol, which is said to have differentiation
properties also).
For antiangiogenesis:
Thalidomide (Thalomid®)
First a review of the clinical trials and other papers on Leukine (GM-CSF) is
presented followed by a discussion on clinical trials with Retinoids and
lastly the combinations of leukine and thalidomide or high dose ketoconazole
and hydrocortisone combined with leukine.
GM-CSF at an Anti-PCa Agent
Overview.
GM-CSF( Sargramostim, Leukine) as a monotherapy has had several clinical
trials and leukine clearly does have activity against hrpca.(3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8) The dosing schedule in these papers has generally been 250 mcg/m2 at
either 14 days continuously followed by 14 days off or 14 days continuously
followed by a Mon-Wed-Fri schedule for 14 days of a 28 day cycle with the
more continuous schedule providing better PSA control. While the attempt to
limit toxicity by reducing the dosing schedule has merit, the lack of
consistent PSA control argues for continuous daily dosing. B. K. Dieckgraefe,
et al (9) found that continuous tx with leukine (8 weeks straight) had no
more side effects than intermittent treatment. Additionally, C. I. Rivas et
al (3) discuss leukine receptors and PCa and concluded that "These findings
imply that both hyperplastic and neoplastic prostatic tissues may be
responsive to GM-CSF."
Clinical Trials.
E J Small et al (5) studied Hrpca patients using 250mcg/m2(about 500mcg)
leukine. Their cohort I had 14 days on leukine and 14 days off (23 men).
About 50% of the men in cohort I experienced declines in PSA while on tx and
rising PSA when tx was stopped in a sawtooth PSA pattern. Also 25% had a >
50% decline in PSA. Median response duration was 3.5 months with some men
having responses longer than 9 months. Cohort II(13 men) had 14 days on
leukine plus 3 days/week for the next 2 weeks. In cohort II, 12 of 13 had a
median PSA decline of 32% with one patient having a >99% decline and an
improved bone scan. The median survival of all patients was 15.8 months.
Toxicity was stated to be minimal.
R. Dreicer et al (7) published a study using 250mcg of leukine on a M-W-F
dosing schedule for 4 weeks and then repeated the treatment. There were 7
hormonally naïve and 9 androgen independent patients. Three of the 9
androgen independent patients had PSA responses "below baseline" and
received all 6 months of tx. This suggests PSA stabilization in these
patients. None of the 4 patients with measurable disease(1 – BS positive
only, 3 – BS and CT scan positive) responded to leukine therapy. The lack of
response is not surprising given the short time frame of the trial (6
months).
Rini et al (8) treated 30 patients with rising PSA post primary therapy(RP
or RT.) The dose of leukine used was 250mcg/m2, 14 days of injections,
followed by 14 days of no injections and then the cycle was repeated. Three
of 29 patients (10%) had A PSA response (50% decrease). Twenty-six (90%)
patients saw their PSA doubling time increase from 8.4 months to 15
months(the other 3 patients had PSA declines.)
On the basis of the above studies, it seems reasonable to use leukine as a
therapy during the off period from chemotherapy. The lengthening of the PSA
doubling time or achieving some disease stabilization, may translate into a
longer off period than would otherwise be achievable. The question also
arises as to whether or not there is a dosing schedule for the leukine that
will improve on the intermittent leukine results noted above – say by daily
injections. Daily dosing as used in (9), for Crohn’s disease, indicates that
no additional toxicity accrues when using daily leukine injections for at
least 8 weeks in a row. With the objective of having at least 6 months off
chemotherapy, daily injections of leukine may be warranted.
Retinoids as Treatments for HRPCa
There are two FDA approved retinoid drugs available – Vesanoid(tretinoin --
all-trans retinoic acid or "ATRA") and Accutane(13-cis retinoic acid.) Both
have seen some clinical trial testing as summarized below. Additionally, but
not discussed here, there are retinoid receptors on both normal and
malignant prostates (Y. Lotan et al (17).)
WK Kelly et al (10). They studied fourteen Hrpca patients were treated with
ATRA (50 mg/m2 p.o. every 8 h daily). No PSA or objective disease responses
were seen. However, they note there was a "potential differentiation
effect."
S Culine et al (11). This paper used an intermittent dosing schedule of
a single oral dose of 45 mg./m.2 ATRA daily for 7 days followed by 7 days of
no treatment, and then resumed treatment on day 14. PSA RR was 15% (4 of 26
patients) and none of the 11 measurable disease patients showed an objective
response.
DL Trump et al (12). 17 patients with HRPC received 50 mg/m2 ATRA three
times daily orally on days 1-14, repeated every 22 days. No PSA responses or
objective disease responses. They say, "Failure of this agent in HRPC may be
related to failure of drug delivery associated with enhanced mechanisms of
ATRA clearance which occur within a few days of beginning ATRA treatment."
M Galsky et al (13), in their review paper on the development of
differentiation agents, is a good review paper that covers all the above and
more. The role of retinoids as differentiation agents may be a key factor in
their application to Hrpca. Galsky et al also say that perhaps longer
exposure time to retinoids is required for them to be effective and hence
patients with a lower disease burden (slowly advancing disease) would be
better subjects.
Two studies of accutane (13-cis retinoic acid) and advanced PCa, but not
Hrpca men, are available. Shalev et al (14) reported on 11 patients with
rising PSAs post radical prostatectomy. The dose of accutane used was
1mg/kg/day for 12 months. Three of the 11 had a PSA reduction for 2-3 months
and one had PSA stabilization for 3 months after an initial sharp PSA rise.
They included a discussion of differentiation. Ferrari et al (15) in a study
of 37 hormone naïve patients, could not determine if the HT plus accutane
was superior to HT alone, but the addition of accutane to standard hormone
therapy did not impair PSA decline or add significant toxicity. Ferrari et
al also discuss differentiation effects.
Leukine and Retinoids
Clinical trials in HRPC patients of the combination of leukine and
retinoids have yet to be done. H Nakajima et al (16) touch on the potential
synergistic action of ATRA and leukine via ATRA's ability to stimulate
production of gm-csf. This is an in vitro study.
Some clinical experience with leukine and retinoids is being accumulated by
Charles E. Myers, MD, director of the American Institute Diseases of the
Prostate – as yet unpublished. Myers has made an astute observation that the
two drugs could be synergistic, allowing lower doses to be used for the
combination. This is turning out to be true in a significant number of
patients.
Leukine® and Thalidomide
Thalidomide, in combination with leukine or thalidomide alone, may
provide another option for extending the off-time.
At the June 2004 American Association of Clinical Oncologists Meeting, M.
Lilly et al (18), gave the results of a phase I trial of leukine and
thalidomide. Leukine activates dendritic cells and thalidomide modulates
T-cell and NK function. Leukine was given daily for 14 days and then every
other day for 3 months. Thalidomide was taken daily starting on day 15 for 3
months total. This small study of 10 HRPC patients determined a maximum
tolerated dose of 250mcg of leukine and 100 mg thalidomide. The PSA response
rate was quite high – 7/9 patients had an average PSA decrease of 50.4% and
1 patient with soft tissue pca had a 60% decrease in the tumor. Low tumor
burden may be important in the duration of response to this treatment. PSA
responses were much longer if pre-treatment PSA was under 50ng/mL than if it
was greater than 50 (26.4 weeks vs 9.5 weeks).
Thalidomide has anti-prostate cancer properties of its own, including
antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory properties (19) and has been tested in
several clinical trials either as a single agent or in combination with
docetaxel. MJ Drake et al (20), using 100mg/day of thalidomide found a 15%
PSA response rate and WD Figg et al (21) using 200mg/day up to 1200mg/day of
thalidomide had a PSA RR of 18% (50% decline criteria) while also finding
that overall 27% of the patients had a decline of over 40% in PSA. Most
recently, WL Dahut et al (22), compared docetaxel(30mg/m2, 3 of 4 weeks)
plus thalidomide (200mg/day) with thalidomide (200mg/day) in a randomized
phase II trial. The combination tx group had a PSA response rate of 53% and
the single agent group’s PSA decline was 37%. Dahut et al also found that
the combination arm required anticoagulation to prevent a high incidence of
DVTs (23% before anticoagulation and 0% after coagulation.)
Leukine® and Ketoconazole(HDK)/Hydrocortisone(HC) (23)
The following study was with keto-,
immunotherapy-, and chemo-naive patients. Whether or not this would be an
effective treatment during the off period from chemotherapy was not
addressed. However, it might work based on anecdotal evidence. Also, whether
or not a patient on high dose ketoconazole who fails that treatment and adds
leukine responds again, also is not known.
First presented at the 2005 Prostate Cancer
Symposium(ASCO) C.J. Ryan et al have published the final results (23.) The
rationale for this trial was the hypothesis that GM-CSF would augment T-cell
response to apoptotic tumor cells and prolong duration of response to ketoconazole.
Patients
-
No prior immunotherapy,
chemotherapy or ketoconazole.
-
49 patients were enrolled,
including 37 with radiographically evident metastases and 12 with
prostate specific antigen only disease.
Study Drugs - dose and schedule.
-
Ketoconazole (HDK) 400mg, 3x/day).
-
Hydrocortisone (HC) 20mg morning, 10 mg evening.
-
Leukine
250 µg / m2, sq on days 15 to 28 of each 28-day cycle.
Results
Primary end point TTP (time to progression) 9.7 months all patients.
Median TTP 6.9 months patients with metastases.
Median TTP 15.4 months patients without metastases.
PSA Response Rate (≥ 50% Decrease in PSA: 75% (36 of 48 patients) (95% CI 60-86).
The authors state that the finding of a longer TTP in non-metastatic
patients suggested that treatment resistance may be a function of tumor
volume.
Side Effects
Side effects
that were determined to be likely due to the treatment were fatigue (Gr 3, 7
patients and Gr 2, 1 patient); nausea (Gr 3, 1 patient); rash (Gr 3, 1
patient); Non cardiac chest pain (Gr 3, 1 patient and Gr 2, 1 patient.)
The non-cardiac chest pain was said to be potentially due to sternal marrow
expansion and occurred during the administration of GM-CSF.
Conclusions
Patients should work closely with their oncologist in understanding how
these drugs might be used to extend the off chemotherapy time. The
information provided in this paper should help with that. Consider using
leukine by itself to extend the time off chemotherapy. Consider also adding
accutane or vesanoid since they may provide a synergistic effect when
combined with leukine. Lastly, if accutane or vesanoid do not provide an
increase in PSA doubling time, thalidomide can be used. In the case of
thalidomide, reducing the dose lower than the maximum tolerated dose to 50mg
might delay any onset of side effects. And lastly, consider the
leukine/ketoconazole combination described above.
A Precaution from the prescribing
information: "Leukine can induce variable increases in WBC and/or platelet
counts. In order to avoid potential complications of excessive
leukocytosis(WBC > 50,000 cells/mm3; ANC> 20,000 cell/mm3, a CBC is
recommended twice per week during Leukine therapy." If these levels
are exceeded, they recommend interrupting administration or decreasing dose
by half.
The ketoconazole and leukine study (23) had in
their protocol that patients could not start gm-csf if the total white blood
count was 30,000/mm3 or greater at the start of a cycle.
Author: Howard Hansen
Date: 9/30/2004, last updated 1/26/2009
Note: The author is not a medical doctor and cannot render medical
advice. As a prostate cancer patient, this was written in an attempt to
understand these treatments and how it affects me. I make no claims that
this review is definitive, complete or authoritative and I request any
contributions to, or clarification of the subject which might contribute to
the issue or inquiry. In conjunction with a medical team, every cancer
patient must make their own decisions regarding treatment options. Your own
medical team's directions should be carefully followed.
References
(1) TM Beer, et al, Intermittent Chemotherapy in Metastatic
Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer, British J. of Cancer(2003) 89,
968-970.
(2) Nakajima H, Kizaki M, Sonoda A, Mori S, Harigaya K, Ikeda Y., Retinoids
(all-trans and 9-cis retinoic acid) stimulate production of macrophage
colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating
factor by human bone marrow stromal cells, Blood. 1994 Dec
15;84(12):4107-15.
(3) Rivas CI, Vera JC, Delgado-Lopez F, Heaney ML, Guaiquil VH, Zhang RH,
Scher HI, Concha II, Nualart F, Cordon-Cardo C, Golde DW. Expression of
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptors in human prostate
cancer. Blood. 1998 Feb 1;91(3):1037-43.
(4) Simmons SJ, Tjoa BA, Rogers M, Elgamal A, Kenny GM, Ragde H, Troychak MJ,
Boynton AL, Murphy GP., GM-CSF as a systemic adjuvant in a phase II prostate
cancer vaccine trial. Prostate. 1999 Jun 1;39(4):291-7.
(5) Small EJ, Reese DM, Um B, Whisenant S, Dixon SC, Figg WD. Therapy of
advanced prostate cancer with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating
factor. Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Jul;5(7):1738-44.
(6) Rini BI, Small EJ. Immunotherapy for prostate cancer. Curr Oncol Rep.
2001 Sep;3(5):418-23. Review. PMID: 11489243 and in Rini BI, Small EJ, The
potential for prostate cancer immunotherapy, Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003
Jun 27;46 Suppl:S117-25.
(7) Dreicer R, See WA, Klein EA. Phase II trial of GM-CSF in advanced
prostate cancer. Invest New Drugs. 2001;19(3):261-5. PMID: 11561685
(8) Rini BI, Weinberg V, Bok R, Small EJ. Prostate-specific antigen kinetics
as a measure of the biologic effect of granulocyte-macrophage
colony-stimulating factor in patients with serologic progression of prostate
cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jan 1;21(1):99-105.
(9) Dieckgraefe, B. K. & Korzenik, J. R. Treatment of active Crohn's disease
with recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor,
Lancet, 2002, 360 (9344): 1478-80.
(10) Kelly WK, Osman I, Reuter VE, Curley T, Heston WD, Nanus DM, Scher HI.
The development of biologic end points in patients treated with
differentiation agents: an experience of retinoids in prostate cancer. Clin
Cancer Res. 2000 Mar;6(3):838-46.
(11) Culine S, Kramar A, Droz JP, Theodore C., Phase II study of all-trans
retinoic acid administered intermittently for hormone refractory prostate
cancer. J Urol. 1999 Jan;161(1):173-5.
(12) Trump DL, Smith DC, Stiff D, Adedoyin A, Day R, Bahnson RR, Hofacker J,
Branch RA., A phase II trial of all-trans-retinoic acid in
hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a clinical trial with detailed
pharmacokinetic analysis., Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1997;39(4):349-56.
(13) 7. Galsky M, Kelly WK., The development of differentiation agents for
the treatment of prostate cancer, Semin Oncol. 2003 Oct;30(5):689-97.
(14) Shalev, M., et al., Effect of 13-cis-retinoic acid(accutane) on serum
prostate-specific antigen levels in patients with recurrent prostate cancer
after radical prostatectomy, Clin Cancer Res, 2000, 6 (10): 3845-9.
(15) Ferrari, A. C. et al., 13-cis retinoic acid (accutane) and complete
androgen blockade in advanced hormone-naïve prostate cancer patients: report
of a phase II randomized study. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20 (2): 538-44.
(16) Nakajima H, Kizaki M, Sonoda A, Mori S, Harigaya K, Ikeda Y., Retinoids
(all-trans and 9-cis retinoic acid) stimulate production of macrophage
colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating
factor by human bone marrow stromal cells, Blood. 1994 Dec
15;84(12):4107-15.
(17) Lotan Y, Xu XC, Shalev M, Lotan R, Williams R, Wheeler TM, Thompson TC,
Kadmon D. Differential expression of nuclear retinoid receptors in normal
and malignant prostates. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jan;18(1):116-21.
(18) M. Lilly, E. H. Rowsell, R. Gurrola, H. Ruckle, Phase I trial of
sargramostim and thalidomide for treatment of hormone-refractory prostate
cancer. ASCO 2004, Abstract No: 4690.
(19) Macpherson GR, Franks M, Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Ando Y, Price DK, Figg WD,
Current status of thalidomide and its role in the treatment of metastatic
prostate cancer, Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003 Jun 27;46 Suppl:S49-57.
(20) Drake MJ, Robson W, Mehta P, Schofield I, Neal DE, Leung HY.
An open-label phase II study of low-dose thalidomide in androgen-independent
prostate cancer, Br J Cancer. 2003 Mar 24;88(6):822-7.
(21) Figg WD, Dahut W, Duray P, Hamilton M, Tompkins A, Steinberg SM, Jones
E, Premkumar A, Linehan WM, Floeter MK, Chen CC, Dixon S, Kohler DR, Kruger
EA, Gubish E, Pluda JM, Reed E, A randomized phase II trial of thalidomide,
an angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with androgen-independent prostate
cancer, Clin Cancer Res. 2001 Jul;7(7):1888-93.
(22) Dahut WL, Gulley JL, Arlen PM, Liu Y, Fedenko KM, Steinberg SM, Wright
JJ, Parnes H, Chen CC, Jones E, Parker CE, Linehan WM, Figg WD.
Randomized phase II trial of docetaxel plus thalidomide in
androgen-independent prostate cancer, J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul
1;22(13):2532-9.
(23) C. J. Ryan, J. Rosenberg, B. Rini, T. Nguyen, V.
Weinberg, E. Small, A phase II trial of ketoconazole plus granulocyte
macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in androgen independent
prostate cancer (AIPC). ASCO 2005 Multidisciplinary Prostate Cancer
Symposium; February 17-19, 2005; Orlando, Florida. Abstract No: 296
(23) Ryan CJ, Weinberg V, Rosenberg J, Fong L,
Lin A, Kim J, Small EJ, Phase II study of ketoconazole plus
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating
factor for prostate cancer: effect of extent of disease on outcome,
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2372-6; discussion
2377. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
[Top]
|