Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer

Understanding    Treating    Maintaining Quality of Life

Home
What's New
News
What To Do First
On Line Support List
Proven Treatments
Potential Treatments
Managing Symptoms
Diagnostic Tests
Information Resources
FAQ
Support HRPCA.org

Return to the Chemotherapy.

Calcitriol as an Antitumor Agent and Enhancer of Chemotherapy Agents - Focus on docetaxel (taxotere).

Combined with taxotere, enhanced responses have been documented in chemo-naive patients and responses reported in taxane-refractory patients as a ≥2nd line response.

 

Definitions

HDPC = high dose pulsed calcitriol (as .5mcg calcitriol/kg of body weight the day before docetaxel/taxotere)

Calcitriol = 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol (1,25 DHCC; 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3, Rocaltrol, Calcitriol)

Docetaxel = taxotere

mcg = micrograms.

kg = kilograms (of body weight).

Introduction

Calcitriol has many interesting properties.  Of relevance here is its role as a chemotherapy sensitizing agent. Calcitriol by itself does not provide an effective anti-HRPC disease treatment.  See also the original paper by Bill Aishman on calcitriol.

A list from pre-clinical studies includes:

  • induces cell cycle arrest (G0/G1) and differentiation. Note: G0 is the resting phase and G1 is the portion of the cell cycle when RNA and protein synthesis production starts increasing.

  • inhibits proliferation of multiple cancer cell lines.

  • downregulates genes that inhibit apoptosis.

  • decreases invasiveness and inhibits angiogenesis.

  • shows synergy with several cytotoxic agents.

D. Trump, MD wrote in the October 2007 Hem/Onc Today: "Our own research group has noted in murine (mouse) and canine (dog) models that calcitriol in high dose potentiates the in vivo antitumor effect of cisplatin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine (Gemzar, Eli Lilly) and mitoxantrone. Accrual of patients is ongoing." The potentiation of HDPC and Taxol (paclitaxel) is weak as documented in taxol and HDPC

With Taxotere (docetaxel), the potentiation appears to be well established, there having been several clinical trials studying this combination. Lastly, combining HDPC and mitoxantrone has some trial data to support using this combination -- see mitoxantrone.

Trump also wrote, in the same article, that "Finally, many investigators have shown that calcitriol potentiates the antitumor activity, in vivo and in vitro, of a number of cytotoxic agents:

  • taxanes (especially taxotere)

  • anthracyclines (doxorubicin, mitoxantrone) - the general class is "antitumor antibiotics"

  • alkylating agents (cisplatin, cytoxan)

  • antimetabolites (gemzar)"

Calculating the dose of HDPC as Originally Implemented by T. Beer et al (2)

Dose of Calcitriol(1, 2): .5 mcg/kg of body weight, taken the day before taxotere. For example: Patient weight 73kg. 73kg x .5mcg = 36.5mcg or 36.5mcg/.5mcg/pill = 73 pills.  An easy way to figure this out is that the number of .5mcg pills taken = Patients weight in kilograms. 80 kg patient would take 80 .5mcg pills.

 

Another example: 200 lbs. / 2.207 lb/kg  = 90.62 kg, .5 x 90.62 = 45.31 mcg, but each pill is .5 mcg so it takes 45.31x2 = 90.6.

 

Beer et al (2) further gave more details on how best to ingest all of these pills.

Patients maintained a reduced calcium diet during the treatment weeks,

restricting daily calcium intake to 400 to 500 mg.  Calcium and magnesium supplements and bile-resin binding agents were prohibited. On days 1, 2, and 3 of each treatment week, patients increased oral hydration by drinking 4 to 6 cups of fluid above their usual intake. Calcitriol (Rocaltrol 0.5µg capsules,) 0.5µg/kg was given orally in four divided doses over 4 hours on day 1 followed by docetaxel (Taxotere) 36 mg/m2 intravenously over 15 to 30 minutes on day 2 of each treatment week. Treatment was administered weekly for 6 consecutive weeks.

 

In reality, since the pills are small, it isn't difficult to take the entire amount in 30-45 minutes along with lots of water. Also, if you are on Zometa, it is likely not necessary to reduce the calcium dose, but be certain to check your calcium level.

 

Calcitriol is also available for IV as Calcijex Injection: 1 mcg/ml, 2 mcg/ml RX. One patient reports this: Started on a low dose of the Calcitriol (IV) for the initial treatment.  He used 4mcg of Calcitriol in the drip – a small bag, not one of the larger size. Plans to increase the dose of Calcitriol.

(Note:The safety of using the IV form has not been evaluated.) Trump wrote in the Oct 2007 Hem/Onc Today the following about the IV form: "While considerable work remains, these data suggest that calcitriol in high doses may be a useful adjunct to standard cancer chemotherapy. A pressing issue that requires delineation is the appropriate dose of high-dose calcitriol. It is clear that high-dose intermittent therapy is safe and nontoxic. We have given up to 100 mcg per week by IV without toxicity, and we are conducting a phase-2 trial in prostate cancer with 77 mcg IV weekly, with no appreciable toxicity. Therefore, determination of the optimal or maximally tolerated dose of calcitriol is a critical step in evaluating this agent as a drug for use in cancer therapy."

 

Clinical Trials of HDPC/Taxotere. Reference #2(TM Beer et al) all patients were chemo-naive. NM Tiffany et al, conducted their trial with every 3 week taxotere (hence HDPC is once every 3 weeks.) - 13 of 24 previously had taxotere.  Petrioli R et al studied weekly dosing, but with patients who had failed previous taxotere chemotherapy.

 

Table 1. Docetaxel in combination with high dose calcitriol and with or without Estramustine Phosphate (Emcyt). (updated 21 August 2009.)

 

Reference

Phase

No. Pts. 

Docetaxel (taxotere)

HD Calcitriol

(HDPC)

Emcyt

 

PSA-RR

50%

M-RR

MTP or MS

(1) NM Tiffany, et al, J Urology 2005

(a), (b)

I/II

24

11 chemo-naïve;

13 prior taxotere

Q 3 week, 60 mg/m2, 70 mg/m2 after cycle 1. 

60 mcg. Not dosed based on body weight.

Emcyt

280 mg TID, days 1-5

Chemo-naïve: 55% (6 of 11);

1 prior taxotere 9% 1 of 11

-

-

(2) TM Beer, et al, JCO, Vol 21, 2003.

II, 37, all chemo-naïve.

Q weekly, day 2 for 6 weeks of 8 week cycle. 36mg/m2.

.5 mcg/kg of body wt on day 1.

 -

30 of 37 (81%).

8/15 (53%) had partial response.

MTP 11.4 mos., MS 19.5 mos., OS at 1 year 89%.

(3) Petrioli R et al., BJU Int. 2007;

(c), (d)

- , 26 pts.

All had failed prior taxotere (c)

 

Weekly for 6 of 8 weeks.(30mg/m2) with oral dex pre-med. 24 cycles max.

32 µg as .5 µg tablets given orally in 3 divided doses on day 1.

-

Eight patients (31%); seven (27%) had a stable PSA level for 12 weeks.

2 pts had measureable disease and both had "stable" disease.

The median time to PSA progression was 4.2 months and the median survival was 9.3 months.

(a) 60mcg calcitriol is a much higher dose than the usual .5mcg/kg of body weight previously used for weekly dosing. 

(b) Patients also received 325 mg aspirin and 1 or 2 mg warfarin orally daily. Four patients had thromboembolic complications.

(c) 18 pts previously treated with weekly epirubicin 30mg/m2 and docetaxel 30mg/m2; 6 with weekly docetaxel 30mg/m2 and two with 3-weekly docetaxel (75mg/m2).  Pts continued to receive bisphosphonates, which were started after failure of 1st-line chemo in all patients with bone mets (24 pts). The median(range) interval between the end of 1st-line chemo and the start of high dose calcitriol and docetaxel was 13 (2-72) weeks. The median duration of the PSA response was 3.8 (2.2-5.4) months.

(d) Toxicity was characterized as very mild. Grade 3 neutropenia in 2 patients and hypercalcaemia (probably related to calcitriol) in only 1. All of the patients discontinued first-line treatment with docetaxel because of progressive disease, which occurred during and within 60 days of docetaxel therapy.

 

 (1) Tiffany NM, Ryan CW, Garzotto M, Wersinger EM, Beer TM, High dose pulse calcitriol, docetaxel and estramustine for androgen independent prostate cancer: a phase I/II study, J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):888-92. This was published earlier in abstract form at ASCO 2004, Abstract 4678.

(2) Tomasz M. Beer, Kristine M. Eilers, Mark Garzotto, Merrill J. Egorin, Bruce A. Lowe, W. David Henner, Weekly High-Dose Calcitriol and Docetaxel in Metastatic Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer; Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 1 (January), 2003: 123-128.

(3) Petrioli R, Pascucci A, Francini E, Marsili S, Sciandivasci A, De Rubertis G, Barbanti G,
Manganelli A, Salvestrini F, Francini G. Weekly high-dose calcitriol and docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer previously exposed to docetaxel, BJU Int. 2007 Oct;100(4):775-9. Epub 2007 May 29. The authors noted that with "no
standard salvage therapy available we hypothesised that high-dose calcitriol might restore sensitivity to chemotherapy."
 

Some Observations Regarding Sequential Use of Taxotere (≥ 2nd line chemo). See paper #3 (Petrioli R et al.)

In selecting a 2nd chemotherapy, distinguish between patients who stop their firstline treatment with taxotere while still responding to the drug because they have completed a planned course of therapy or desire a break due to adverse effects. (they might also be eligible for intermittent chemo where taxotere is used, PSA is lowered, stop taxotere, PSA starts rising, re-start taxotere.


Thus there is an important distinction between patients who have truly docetaxel-resistant disease and those who have been exposed to docetaxel and now have progression, but might still have docetaxel-sensitive disease. In this group of patients a repeated treatment with docetaxel might be appropriate if progression occurs after a reasonably long interval (6-12 mos or more). 

 

Petrioli (3) et al, say that "therefore the characteristics of the patients seem to support an effective role of high-dose calcitriol in restoring sensitivity to the drug."

 

Note, however, that seven of eight responses were in patients who had shown an initial response to previous docetaxel as first-line treatment. This finding suggests that the apparent restoration of sensitivity to the drug by using high-dose calcitriol might develop almost exclusively in those patients who previously had a response to first-line treatment with docetaxel-based chemotherapy.
 

Update on Asentar (DN-101)/Taxotere vs HDPC/Taxotere

We may never know just why there was a reduced survival in the DN-101 plus taxotere arm than in the every 3 week taxotere alone arm.  I have included two items from press releases to illustrate how things have changed with the development of Asentar from promising to no longer being developed.  Of course, patients can still use the original T. Beer et al phase II results to guide them (.5mcg/kg of body weight day before taxotere) (see reference 16.)

7 November 2007. DN-101/Asentar ASCENT trial was halted on 5 November 2007 due to more deaths in the DN-101 plus taxotere arm than in the taxotere alone arm.  Novacea is continuing to examine the data and working with the principal investigators in order to determine the cause of this. 

11 September 2008. Novacea today reported that it has received notice from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that the agency has released the clinical hold on the AsentarTM Investigational New Drug (IND) application.

 

The FDA's response was based on the completion of their review of information submitted by Novacea to address issues relating to the clinical hold raised by the regulatory agency in November 2007. Novacea had terminated the ASCENT-2 Phase 3 clinical trial in November 2007 due to an unexplained imbalance of deaths between the treatment and control arms of the trial.

 

As part of their guidance, the FDA requires that any future clinical studies conducted with Asentar must include in the consent form an unambiguous statement that the ASCENT-2 trial showed reduced survival for patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) given Asentar in combination with weekly Taxotere (docetaxel) chemotherapy, as compared to AIPC patients receiving Taxotere administered every three weeks without Asentar. Also, any future consent form must not make reference to any survival benefits observed in earlier clinical trials involving Asentar for the treatment of AIPC patients. As previously announced, Novacea has no clinical trials planned for Asentar.

 

"We are pleased that the FDA released the clinical hold on Asentar following their review," said Edward F. Schnipper, M.D., Novacea's executive vice president and chief medical officer.  

John P. Walker, Novacea's chief executive officer and chairman of the board, commented, "We welcome the FDA's response regarding their release of the clinical hold on Asentar. Following the exciting news last week regarding our proposed merger with Transcept Pharmaceuticals, and the related new direction for Novacea, we have no plans for further development of Asentar."

DN-101 vs Calcitriol

DN-101 is consistently referred to as calcitriol, but in a different package.  Novacea ended up with pills containing 15mcg calcitriol and 45 mcg calcitriol.  The 45 mcg capsule was the maximum tolerated dose for weekly administration.

Here's how they measured the calcitriol levels: "Calcitriol plasma concentrations were determined by a commercial RIA that uses a double antibody (DiaSorin, S.P.A. Saluggia, Italy). The limit of detection was 4.0 pg/mL for 1,25-(OH)2D3 and 1,25-(OH)2D2 with negligible cross-reactivities to 25-(OH)D3, 24,25-(OH)2D3, and 25,26-(OH)2D3; the coefficients of variation were 12% intraassay and 15% interassay; linearity of dilutions ranges from 7 to 87 pg/mL; and recovery was 4 to 31 pg/mL within 80% to 120%. For samples that contained calcitriol concentrations greater than the upper limit of detection of the method, the samples were diluted from 10:1 to 100:1 (with the zero standard buffer provided by the assay manufacturer per instructions of the manufacturer, depending on the expected serum concentration) to a target concentration within the calibration curve and reassayed."

The usual formula for calcitriol is: 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol (1,25 DHCC; 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3, Rocaltrol, Calcitriol) so DN-101 is calcitriol in a different, more compact package.

Editorial comment: I'd hate to see a useful option disappear for HRPC patients to use, but please use HDPC with caution.  I was doing single agent taxotere and when that failed, I added HDPC and had a continued long response. 

The mystery of DN-101/Taxotere someday may make a good story if anyone writes it up.

 (1) Tomasz M. Beer, Milind Javle, Gilbert N. Lam, W. David Henner, Alvin Wong, and Donald L. Trump Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of a Single Dose of DN-101, a New Formulation of Calcitriol, in Patients with Cancer, Clin. Cancer Res. 2005 11: 7794-7799.

Anecdotal Reports - Chemo-naive Patients

G&CG: My psa has gone from 350 to 23 in about 4 months on the taxotere and calcitriol. My red and white cell counts go up and down with the help (up) of injections. Some days I have no energy; but am seldom dizzy. This is a big improvement for me compared to last summer.

PJM wrote: It appears to have worked.  (Of course the question remains "Would the Taxotere have worked w/o the Rocaltrol anyway?")   The PSA decreased from 900+ to 70 when it leveled off.  Three months later I tried the combo again without success.  The only problem I had was facing those 78 pills each week.  Insurance covered it and there was the extra comfort of the extra boost. I had 20 plus treatments.  

Note that calcitriol is available for IV as Calcijex Injection: 1 mcg/ml, 2 mcg/ml RX. One patient reports this: Started on a low dose of the Calcitriol (IV) for the initial treatment.  He used 4mcg of Calcitriol in the drip – a small bag, not one of the larger size. Plans to increase the dose of Calcitriol.

 

For more information on calcitriol, see Bill Aishman's original paper.

 

Howard Hansen, 22 August 2009

[Top]

 


 

 

This information is provided for educational purposes only and does not replace or amend professional medical advice. Unless otherwise stated and credited, the content of this website is by and the opinion of and copyright © 2001-2010 by Howard Hansen. All Rights Reserved.  Our policy regarding privacy,  right to reprint and contact information are at About Us. We are a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit public charity.